//
you're reading...
Economy

China and India: Competitors or Collaborators?

Manmohan Singh, current prime minister of India.

Manmohan Singh

Shahid Javed Burki

Introduction

It has now become a cliché to talk about China and India as the rising giants in the global economy. As  President Barack Obama famously observed during his state visit to India in November 2010, ‘India was not rising; it had already risen.’ A similar statement was made of China a decade ago. Combined, the two countries carry close to 40 per cent of the world’s population.  They  account  for  almost  10  per  cent  of  global  production.  This  year,  both countries  saw  their  GDP  grow  nearly  10  per  cent;  this  rise  accounts  for  the  greatest contribution to global output.

What is interesting is that the two countries have taken very different routes to attain their present state of development. The result of the different paths taken by China and India are two very different economic  structures and possibly two very different economic futures. Given  these  differences,  will  the  countries  become  competitors  or  collaborators  in  the evolving global economic and political systems? A historical  comparison to today’s China and India could be made with France and England of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century – two sets of countries both rising in economic prosperity and linked by geographical proximity. The question remains of whether China and India create a bond or take the route of France and England, creating decades of hostility.

One complication for China and India may be that they share a long border, parts of which are still contested. That said, it is more than likely that the two Asian giants will work with each  other  to  their  mutual  advantage  rather  than  become  hostile  neighbours.  It  seems extremely unlikely that the border disputes will not be resolved diplomatically and, therefore, not re-enacting the military actions of 1962.

Economic Transformations of China and India

China began its journey towards rapid economic growth and modernisation in 1976 when the mantle of  leadership moved from the shoulders of Mao Zedong, the founder of modern China, to Deng Xiaoping, the country’s builder. India’s rise started a decade and half later in

1991, under the stewardship of Dr Manmohan Singh, the country’s current Prime Minister and then Finance Minister.

The process of economic change began in both countries during periods of great crises. In China the crisis was political. An ailing Mao became erratic in his tactics for establishing his successor.  He  had  attempted  to  influence  his  succession  by  sending  a  number  of  his competitors, including Deng Xiaoping, into domestic exile. Deng bided his time and after a struggle with the group that came to be called the ‘gang of four’ which included Mao’s wife. Deng later  emerged as the undisputed leader of post-Mao China. For India the crisis was economic as the country faced a severe BoP crisis that led to the pledging of gold to obtain finance which would keep its international payments current. It was clear to the managers of the Indian economy that the old model of excessive control by the state over the processes of production had not worked. It had established what had come to be called the ‘license raj’ which  kept  a  tight  control  over  private  investments,  permitting  only  those  that  were considered to be socially desirable. The result was what Indian economists themselves had called the ‘Hindu rate of growth’ – increase in the rate of GDP of about 3 to 3.5 per cent – not enough to deal with the growing problem of poverty. The slight opening in the market that was allowed in the mid-1980s by the Congress Party government headed by Narashima Rao had put an enormous amount of pressure on external accounts.  With the opening, imports picked up while exports remained stagnant.

There are a number of other similarities between the two countries in addition to the origin of periods  of  development  in  deep  crises.  Both  countries  are  modernising  rapidly,  India somewhat more narrowly than China where the process of change is much broader in scope. Both are seeing enormous growth in the sizes of their urban populations. Both are becoming integrated in the global economy, again China more rapidly and more thoroughly than India.

Differences between China and India

Apart from the similarities noted above, there are a number of differences in the way the two countries are being managed. India is a well functioning democracy that over the years has been able to give voice to its diverse citizenry and provided enough space within the political system not to have those with grievances to  adopt approaches outside the constitutions to express their frustration. The political system in China is centrally managed with little space allotted to those who are aggrieved and would like to express their views. This is certainly the case if these views markedly differ from those held by the ruling Communist Party. A vibrant print and electronic media in India is fully representative of its boisterous democracy. In the decentralised  Indian  political  system,  a  variety  of  political  parties  hold  power  in  the constituent states. In China, the centre and the provinces are governed by the same party – the Communist Party.

The structures of the two economies differ. In spite of rapid development of the economy and the modernisation of a number of sectors, India remains a largely rural and agrarian-based economy. On the other hand, manufacturing is a large sector for China. China relies much more on external trade to find  markets for its rapidly developing industrial base. In India, output of the economy is much more oriented towards meeting domestic demand. There is no international  pressure  on  India  to  stimulate  its  domestic  demand  for  feeding  economic growth.  Such  a pressure has  been  exerted  on  China for  years. Many in  the West  –  in particular in the US – believe that the global economic imbalances can only be corrected if China moves its growth strategy from export expansion to domestic demand promotion, and in the process appreciates its currency.

The Process of Development in the Two Countries

How did the two countries reach their present economic situations? For both it happened in two phases.

In China, there was emphasis on human resource development and achieving food self- sufficiency during the Mao period from 1949 to 1976. During this time the country was able to achieve universal primary education and universal primary health coverage. It also brought out its women from near-servitude. The second phase from 1979 to 2011 saw China become the  workshop  for  the  global  economy  moving  from  the  production  of  labour-intensive manufacturing to technologically sophisticated goods.

India’s two phases were from 1947 to 1991 and from 1991 to the present. In the first phase, it put the state on the commanding heights of the economy in order to invest in heavy industries for the public sector. In the second phase, it pulled the state back and allowed more freedom to the private sector. India now gives the state a much less significant role than it did during the period of the ‘license raj’. That is not to say that the state has pulled back entirely. For instance, foreign direct investment is still allowed in a limited extent in some sectors. In retail trade,  for instance, multi-brand stores  are not  allowed to be established.  Investments in finance and insurance are also subject to strict state scrutiny and control.

On the external side, China has a policy of working with its neighbours to develop a regional economic  system,  making them less reliant on the markets in the West. It is correct in assuming that those markets, given the serious demographic transitions they are experiencing, have only a very limited capacity for expansion. The expansion that will take place will be in non-tradables such as healthcare. India, on the other hand, remains indifferent towards much of its immediate neighbourhood, preferring to leap-frog over them  and reach out to the rapidly  transforming  economies  of  East  Asia.  China  has  used  the  large  programme  of domestic demand stimulation to deal with the Great Recession of 2008-09 by connecting

itself with its neighbours by building a modern transport infrastructure.

Devising a more China-India-Centric System of Global Economic Management

With these differences in history and endowments, the two countries will have to work hard to work together.  One way of doing this will be to create a G2 between them based on developing common positions on international economic issues. During his first official visit to  Asia  in  November  2009,  US  President  Barack  Obama  indicated  his  support  for  the establishment of a new political order for the management of  the global economy. A G2 made up of the US and China would be at the apex of the system followed by the G20 that is made up of seven industrial countries, 12 large emerging economies and the European Union. Most of the large policy initiatives would be the responsibility of the US and China, while India would be relegated to the second tier. The Chinese did not show much enthusiasm for the proposal. It was for this reason that President Obama began to court India a year later when he visited that country.

On the other hand, a G2 arrangement involving China and India may better serve their separate and mutual interests. They could also begin to gather under one umbrella the various regional economic and trading arrangements that have proliferated in the last few decades. They should develop a common approach in gaining access to the global resources that both are deficient in. In other words, the idea should be to stress the commonality rather than allow other large global powers to put an accent on the perceived differences  between the Asian powers.

About asik5678

Don't care about others be honest

Discussion

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

Pages

My Pledge

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3 other followers

%d bloggers like this: